How do you feel about bulk. How do Russians feel about bulk. Navalny's new projects

We need to help Navalny. So far, he is the only foreseeable hope that the country and the region will begin to climb out of the swamp.

Nikolay Zmielov

No matter how anyone treats him, but today he does a lot of sensible and correct, most importantly, he tries to speak the bitter truth about us and about himself ... He needs help, the fact, if not by participation in his projects, then at least with money ... On the Internet, Navalny's film was watched by almost 10 million people, but this does not arouse interest among information structures and no one is trying to comprehend the event, so "Vomsk" cowardly hid behind Navalny, because it is impossible to discuss corrupt bureaucrats and why not?

Tatiana Nagibina

Each has its own truth. The truth from Zhirik is also liked by a certain electorate. The same is about Navalny, everyone hears his truth in his own way. You think that he is the most truthful, others do not perceive his truth.

Dmitry Pominov

Bulk is a competent player, it will be interesting. Navalny is an integral part of the existing system of the Russian Federation. If it were not for it, it would have to be invented) This is both a "whistle blowing steam", and a person around whom potential opposition groups - and it is easy to calculate and take "under the hood", and an instrument in intra-clan showdowns in the country. And this figure plays quite interesting combinations. This, so to speak, is a pike, so that the crucian does not doze. It will be interesting to look at our local "carp" when this player enters the area)

Igor Rodionov

Bulk fellow. Navalny's admission to the presidential elections is a necessary condition for the evolution of the political system. I support with all my hands and even a little money.

Boris Ivanchuk

I want, I'm going to meet the Primary's arrival. Ready to help!

Roman Terekhov

Tell Navalny that Omsk is the same city where a completely random passer-by hit the first and last President of the USSR Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev in the face ...

Elena Kaspirovich

I'm for Navalny. Of course, he is an ambiguous figure. I don't like his connections with nationalists in the past. I understand perfectly well that what he does is beyond the bounds of what is permissible in our country. Only now one gets the impression that he is playing with this system according to some strange rules, as if invented for him alone. And this cannot but suggest that he is a project of the Kremlin, or some of its towers. BUT! All this seems to me secondary, because now Navalny is trying to launch completely new processes in society, democratic in nature. Moreover, he very competently approaches the organization of his activities, which is worth one presentation of the material. I do not know if I will vote for him in the presidential elections, there is still a year ahead. But I am sure that if we want to move towards democracy, Navalny must be supported. Sorry for money - support with likes and reposts.

Andrey Kononenko

Navalny is good at destroying. A sort of mini-Yeltsin. It is difficult for him to create. Well, and some dictator among his hamsters.

Anna Tarasenko

I can't believe him, even if you crack it. I look at the face, facial expressions, I hear intonations - and that's it, I don't believe in sincerity. The feeling does not leave that, once he gets power, he will begin to use it for personal purposes, like those whom he is now criticizing. I repeat: sensations. I don't want to argue with anyone :-)

Lyudmila Korostel

Personally, he scares me. He has completely unhealthy eyes. I clearly see it, and I speak without irony, redneck or anything else. I sinned once and called it "death," just out of shock. I cannot say that this person is insane, since I am not a doctor. But mark my word - it is very much accented. And it will be used. Necessarily both "ours" and "strangers". I sympathize with him and I feel humanly sorry for him. I feel like he's close to burnout. Needs good rest and revitalization. His supporters need to take care of him, not because the current government wants to "remove" him - this is nonsense. He has the same call of the abyss as Nemtsov. Hero, Prometheus, Wrestler. But not sober, not sober at all. Which means irresponsible. Lamb. God forbid, it will finally get used to the role, it will be like with Boris Efimovich. But ... lambs who have seized upon the source of strength easily turn into goats. They need to eat. This is a purely personal opinion, extremely personal. No pretense of any impartiality.

The punishment for civil passivity is the power of villains. (Plato)

Alexey Anatolyevich Navalny - who is he? A truth-teller, thirsting for justice for his people, or another character who thinks that it is his turn to buy yachts and airplanes from the state budget?

A fighter for the welfare and sovereignty of his country or a crazy nationalist? Is he really ready to prove his statements by deeds, or is he just another Druzhko who came for the hype from politics?

So let's start by saying who is Navalny?

Opposition politician, founder of the Anti-Corruption Foundation and actively opposing the current government. Besides, was nominated for the presidencyRussian Federation in 2018.


Biography

Very little is known about Alexei's childhood. Navalny was born and raised in the village Butyn, Odintsovo district, Moscow region. His father comes from Of Ukraine, from the village of Zalesye, which was in the Chernobyl zone.

Little Alyosha spent every summer with his grandmother, grazing cows and digging in the beds, but after the accident at the nuclear power plant, the village of Zalesye was erased from all maps. Alexei's mother also hails from the village, but located near Zelenograd in the Moscow region.

As Navalny himself once said: "I consider myself to be more Ukrainian, by my roots and genetics".

As for his personal life, today, Navalny has a wife and two children.

Education

After school, Alexey entered Faculty of LawPeoples' Friendship University of Russia, and a year after graduation, to the Academy under the Government of the Russian Federation, specializing in Securities and Stock Exchange.

Studying at higher educational institutions, Navalny along the way, he tries to do business, but does not find much success in this area. He was the founder of several firms, but they all did not bring much income.


Political life

Alexey felt his first taste of success when he got involved in politics. Since the early 2000s, he worked as a deputy director at the company "Allect"... Things were going mediocre, but in 2007, during the Duma elections, a company cut down on an advertisement for a party of right-wing forces. 99,000,000 rublesfrom which Navalny received a commission in the amount of 5,000,000 rubles.

Advertising of the right-wing parties was not Alexei's only connection with politics. In 2000 he joined the party "An Apple" and rose to the position of head of the Moscow branch of the party, at the same time broadcasting on the radio Echo of Moscow, but was soon expelled from the ranks of the party with the wording: "For nationalist activities".

Navalny, however, said that he was removed for criticizing the leadership, and he himself refers to normal nationalists.

If we consider Navalny's nationalist ideas and proposals, then they do not seem so absurd. And later, Navalny creates a moderately nationalist party "People". One of the most interesting ideas of which is introduction of a visa regime with the countries of the Caucasus.

Despite the scandal, Navalny does not lose touch with the party « An Apple « and on their recommendation goes to study at Yale University.

Upon return passed the exams and got the lawyer's crust. Subsequently, created his own law office, which did not win a single case, and in less than a year, it was liquidated.

But the most important thing that Alexey began to do, after returning from Yale University, is to conduct corruption investigations, intensify criticism of the current government in the country and create anti-corruption projects like RosPila and RosYams.

For a wider dissemination of his ideas, Navalny starts his blogwhere he publishes an article on how during the construction of an oil pipeline in China, 4 billion US dollars were stolen... The blog soared to the first lines of the top Yandex blogs and brought its owner the first unthinkable popularity on the net. In 2011, the blog occupied the first a place among the blogs of politicians and public figures.

After his participation in protest movements begins, the courts for " Kirovles "and" Yves Rocher "as a result of which he almost sat down, but cases were obviously fabricated against him.


Participation in elections for the post of mayor of Moscow

Yielding to Sobyanin, Navalny ranks second in the elections. By the way, even then Alexei received the approval of many media personalities. At a concert in support of his campaign performed absolutely free several stars of show business such as: Diana Arbenina (gr. Night Snipers) and Vladi (gr. Casta). By the way, the Kasta group released a music album, where they raised acute social topics in their tracks.


Documentary

Navalny burst into Russian YouTube epic with a movie "He's not Dimon for you"... Alexey found a platform that was not limited by censorship and that allows him to convey the truth to the maximum number of viewers. Navalny became one of the top bloggers in the country, while not running challenges with condoms on his head and not overlooking expensive cars.

Talking about the life of the Russian people, who are located outside the Moscow Ring Road, immersed in poverty and continuous problems, Alexei exposed the true face of the people's poverty in the vastness of the richest country.


Navalny's new projects

One of the new projects that Alexey and his team launched in 2018 - Pensiya.org... On this website, every Russian who disagrees with raising the retirement age can leave an application. Then, on his behalf, the service will send an appeal to one of the deputies who supported the initiative. In addition, before the elections, the voter will receive a message with a list of deputies who approved the increase in the retirement age.

Another fresh project - "Smart voting" - invites voters opposed to the United Russia party to cast their votes for another opposition candidate. Indeed, according to Navalny, the ruling party often wins with a fairly low percentage of votes - 30-35%, and the rest is distributed among the opposition candidates.

On December 4, 2018, the project site was blocked by Roskomnadzor for processing personal data of users without their consent. Nevertheless, Navalny's "Smart Voting" performed well in the last elections to the Moscow City Duma. Thanks to him, several independent and honest candidates managed to get mandates.

During elections in St. Petersburg in 2019, Alexey put forward his candidacy for the post of municipal deputy. Its main goal was to complicate getting a deputy seat for Alexander Beglov and to create conditions for the second round of elections. To achieve this goal, Alexei was ready to unite with other parties, even despite ideological differences.

In the same year, the project was launched "Navalny Trade Union", on the website of which everyone can get acquainted with the average salary of a state employee in the region. If the indicator of real wages differs from the declared one, you can leave an anonymous application for filing a complaint on the website. This project was unexpectedly supported by the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation, who said that any help in monitoring the execution of the "May decrees" is important.

conclusions

Each of us is free to judge for himself how honest this character is with the audience when he promises: "Give me power and it will work for you."

Our resource is by no means a supporter of imposing our conclusions on the reader.

Looking at the reaction of the authorities, which makes custom-made videos covering unsubstantiated facts about Navalny or buys "Pop prostitutes" and "True" rappers like Ptahwho were drug addicts yesterday, and today are on the side of the government; or invites dumb bloggers to the Duma so that they dissuade young people from going to rallies - it's easy to take the right side, even if you are extremely critical of the statements of both opponents (Navalny vs. the current government), but we live in an era when the YouTube viewer needs “proofs” ".

Navalny provides them, unlike the newly minted richest blogger-billionaire Alisher Usmanov, which the cannot provide evidence for his statements and behaves familiarand, in some places, cattle in relation to both Navalny and the viewer.

We in no way call our readers to radical action and do not say that we are full supporters of the opposition ideas of Alexei Navalny.

All we want to convey is that corruption in Russia has become an obvious fact. And it thrives to the very top. The servants of the people simply have their own people, and we have come to terms with the fate of the slaves of our servants.

And if we summarize the full analysis of Navalny's activities, then while he is a clear people's leader, but as practice shows, the winner is not the one who collects views and subscribers, gaining popular recognition, standing with the people in the squares, but the one who has power over the ballot boxes at polling stations . In general, referring to the words of the great:


Good luck, friends and good mood to you!

"Has grown somewhat, then his attitude has slightly deteriorated. The Levada expert connects the fall with the context of events in Ukraine.

As can be seen from Levada's data, Navalny's recognition has been steadily growing since April 2011. The jump in its popularity, obviously, occurred after the radio debate with the deputy of the Duma, United Russia, during which the “crooks and thieves” meme was born, which dealt a strong blow to the brand. In 2011-2012, he became one of the leaders in a series of protests against election fraud in and increases awareness at the federal level. In the summer of 2012, Navalny was arrested in the Kirovles case and was placed under house arrest.

“By September 2013, in connection with the election of the mayor of Moscow, the recognition rates have reached their maximum and since then have been kept on average at the same level, but less than in 2013.

At the same time, the attitude towards him worsens. If in 2013, to one degree or another, a positive attitude was recorded by 30%, and a negative - by 20%, but now this is the opposite ratio - 17 and 37% ",
- the deputy director of the center says to Gazeta.Ru.

The Levada table shows how in 2014 the recognition of the oppositionist cut off from the outside world falls.

Explaining the attitude of respondents to the verdict and personality of Navalny, Grazhdankin states that each new verdict of the court is assessed by respondents as more and more adequate to what is happening: “Thus, assessments inspired by the authorities are increasingly prevailing. This is inevitable, since over the past year we have noticed that interest in the activities of the opposition, trust in the opposition has sharply decreased. The events on the Kiev Maidan a year ago spoiled the image in the eyes of the layman of any kind of protest activity. "

The vice president believes that Navalny's recognition after the election campaign remains high, he is remembered. The political scientist associates a slight increase in recognition in recent months with the December verdict and the expected protests in the event of a real term.

“Judging by the set of assessments, the attitude towards Navalny is well established. Groups of sympathizers and those who sharply reject him stood out. A huge number of people treat him indifferently, - Makarkin comments on the survey in relation to respondents to Navalny. - According to the verdict, people were also divided into two tough subcultures: "Navalny is completely right" versus "Navalny is completely to blame" and groups with a softer attitude. Due to the suspended sentence (although brother Oleg Navalny was given a real term), Navalny did not become a victim in the eyes of the majority. Outside of their subculture, a detached attitude towards him with various shades, but without a great interest in fate. "

However, the political scientist suggests not to underestimate the importance of active supporters of Navalny: “This is only a few percent, but they can even go to an unauthorized rally in support of him. Here one must judge not only by the numbers, but also by the willingness of the active group to do something in defense. Consistent supporters of Navalny are resourceful and active. "

As for the decline in respondents loyal to Navalny in relation to the verdict, Makarkin recalls the “Crimea effect”.

“Crimea and the situation in the east of Ukraine played a role. Navalny adjusted his position on Crimea from a sharp rejection to a more ambivalent position. But the fact is that the rift has already occurred and for some of the former “Bolotnaya” sympathizers everything connected with it has become unacceptable. These are partly representatives of the leftist and nationalist subculture, with which Navalny actively played, - the political scientist argues. - This is the periphery of the protest, apolitical people who simply do not like officials - they are not liberals and for them the reference point is greater than Andropov. When it was necessary to make a choice to annex Crimea, for many of them the theses about the “great country and the return of Crimea” turned out to be of higher values \u200b\u200bthan the fight against corruption or the fight for freedom. Now the situation has stabilized and politically active groups have made their minds and dispersed to the corners. "

The question remains how Navalny can expand his loyal audience in the current environment. Makarkin says that adjusting his position on Crimea will deprive Navalny of some of the liberal sympathizers who are poorly read by the instruments of sociology. However, this step will subsequently help to gain the trust of more traditionalist groups.

In addition, Makarkin draws attention to the fact that Navalny, together with Khodorkovsky, are stepping up the anti-corruption agenda and the topic of ineffectiveness of the government, which is important against the background of the economic crisis. Navalny is conducting an investigation on this topic, and Khodorkovsky is asking European leaders to disclose data on the property and accounts of the Russian elite abroad.

“In a crisis, requests for such signals may grow. Society is increasingly irritated and confused. The euphoria from Crimea has long gone, and in this situation Navalny, on the one hand, says that we will not give up Crimea, and the negotiations can drag on for decades, and on the other hand, he acts as a whistle-blower. The demand for this may grow, which is what Navalny is preparing for ”,

- concludes Makarkin.

The Levada poll was conducted on January 23-26, 2015 on a representative all-Russian sample of urban and rural population among 1600 people aged 18 and over in 134 settlements in 46 regions of the country. The distribution of answers is given as a percentage of the total number of respondents, together with data from previous surveys. The statistical error of the data of these studies does not exceed 3.4%.

More than half of citizens are either indifferent to the politician or do not know about him

Opposition politician, founder of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) Alexei Navalny is indifferent to most Russians. The criminal case against FBK is supported by almost a third of the population, according to the results of a sociological survey.

According to the Levada Center survey, almost two-thirds of Russians are either not aware of Navalny's activities or are indifferent to him (31% each). Only 9% of respondents have a positive attitude towards Navalny, and every fourth - negatively. It is noted that in two years the politician's popularity has grown by 10 percentage points - from 55% to 65%.

Almost half of Russians (47%) know nothing about the criminal case against FBK, which is suspected of money laundering, as well as searches at the fund's headquarters. Among the knowledgeable part of the population, opinions on the FBK case were divided. 18% of respondents said that the authorities suppress independent anti-corruption investigations with the help of a criminal case. The same number of Russians are of the opinion that in this way the state opposes external interference in the internal affairs of the state. The smallest number of people (12%) believe that the attacks on FBK are really related to the fund's money laundering, Interfax reports.

In early October, FBK was included in the list of foreign agents in Russia by the decision of the Ministry of Justice. The head of the department of the Ministry of Justice for NPO affairs, Vladimir Titov, explained that the department has all the evidence of foreign funding. According to the Ministry of Justice, FBK received two tranches from Spain and one from the United States in the amount of 140 thousand rubles.

Navalny's Fund October 18 The Ministry of Justice in the Zamoskvoretsky Court of Moscow, demanding to exclude the organization from the list of foreign agents. However, on November 1, the court made a legal decision of the Ministry of Justice.

In September and October, mass searches were carried out in the regional divisions of the FBK. The first wave occurred in September - 150 searches were carried out in 45 cities. The second in mid-October, the centurion of searches took place in 30 regions. According to the fund's employees, their equipment is confiscated and bank accounts are blocked.